The 2016 Olympics Are Chicago's as Long as "They Don't Muck It Up"

As the 2008 Olympics in Beijing came to a close Sunday night, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley returned to his city, and it has become clear, at least according to a Chicago Tribune report, that the 2016 Olympics are Chicago's to lose.

"Chicago has emerged as the frontrunner in the race for the 2016 Olympics, some insiders say, noting that the Windy City delegation's low-key, deferential approach is playing well among international sports leaders gathered here for the Summer Olympics," the Tribune wrote in Tuesday's paper.

"It's Chicago's to lose," said one member of the International Olympic Committee. "If they don't muck it up, they should win."

Being to Chicago on numerous occasions, I personally think this would be a great idea for the city. There are many beautiful locations along the lake where the Olympic village would reportedly be, and it really would be a great event.

The only problem is that it's extraordinarily hot in Chicago in August (we're talking upper 90s), so it might be tough for some athletes to compete in that type of weather.

On the other hand, marathon runners from Africa see warmer temperatures quite often, so maybe the weather's a bit overblown.

We'll see though, so stay tuned for more information. In the meantime, feel free to discuss whether or not the Olympics in Chicago would be a good idea in the message boards.

I'll be there.